quinn lawyers
For most Australians, the home is not just their most significant financial asset, but a place of security and stability, especially if children are involved. Beyond the memories attached to a home, the practical question of “who gets the house?” is often the most pressing financial concern after a couple separate.
This article explores how Australian law approaches the division of property, including the family home, after a breakup. The information is general only and does not constitute legal, taxation or financial advice. You should obtain professional advice tailored to your circumstances before making decisions.
The Family Law Act 1975 sets out the principles for altering property interests, and courts commonly apply a step‑by‑step approach: identifying the property pool, assessing contributions, considering each party’s future needs, and then deciding whether the overall outcome is just and equitable.
This applies for both married and de facto couples, provided the de facto couple meet certain criteria. Relevant factors considered for de facto couples include the duration of the relationship, whether there is a child of the relationship, the existence of substantial contributions, or whether the relationship is registered.
The parties’ assets and liabilities are considered. Assets commonly include the family home and other real estate, superannuation, motor vehicles, shares, and savings. Generally, all assets, whether held jointly or individually, or through a trust or company, are identified in the property pool for division, and any additional financial resources (such as certain trust interests or anticipated inheritances) are taken into account when assessing contributions and future needs.
Determine what each person brought to the relationship. This is broken down into:
The law considers what each person needs moving forward. If one partner has a lower earning capacity or will be the primary carer for children, they may be entitled to a larger share of the asset pool to ensure they can support themselves and the children. Other factors, such as age, health and the availability of financial resources, can also be considered when assessing “future needs”.
Where there has been family violence, the court may take into account its impact on a person’s ability to contribute during the relationship and its ongoing economic effects, which may justify an adjustment in their favour. Family violence can also be relevant to a person’s future needs, for example, where it has ongoing consequences for their health, safety or earning capacity.
In determining a final property settlement, a court will step back and ask: “Is this overall result fair to both parties?” The court must be satisfied that the proposed orders are just and equitable in all of the circumstances.
Yes, depending on the circumstances. It is common for one party to keep the home, but this usually requires a “buy-out” from the other party. This is often achieved by refinancing the mortgage into one name and taking out extra funds to pay the departing party.
If neither person can afford to buy the other out, or cannot agree on who should stay, the most common outcome is that the house is sold, and the proceeds are divided according to the settlement percentage.
Often, the biggest conflict happens right at the start: who lives in the house now? Following are some key considerations:
If you have recently separated and are worried about the family home, consider these practical steps:
Even if you and your ex-partner separate on good terms, independent legal advice is vital before finalising a property settlement.
Stamp duty exemptions or concessions are often available for transfers of real estate carried out under a compliant family law property settlement, but the rules are set by each state or territory and are only available where the transfer satisfies the statutory requirements (for example, being made pursuant to a court order or an eligible financial agreement). Because these rules differ between jurisdictions and can change over time, it is important to obtain advice about the current position in the state or territory where the property is located.
Other considerations such as capital gains tax may also be relevant which can make a significant impact on the overall property adjustment. The way CGT main residence exemptions and rollover relief apply can depend on the specific facts and timing of any transfer or later sale. Consulting a financial advisor/tax professional can ensure these factors are appropriately considered.
If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please call +61 2 9283 3344 or email [email protected].
Back to NewsThe closest train stations are Town Hall, taking the Park Street exit, or St James Station, taking the Elizabeth Street exit. John R Quinn & Co. is on the corner of Park and Elizabeth.
Best parking is in the Domain parking station. Take the moving footway and cross Hyde Park to reach our offices.

