John R QuinnJohn R Quinn
  • Home
  • Home
  • Services
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Divorce & Separation
    • Property & Financial Arrangements
    • Wills & Succession Act
    • Children & Parenting
    • Overseas & Expatriates
    • De Facto Matters
  • Our Lawyers
    • John R. Quinn
    • Marion Morrison-Boyd
    • Kevin O’Kane
  • News
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • (+61 2) 9283 3344
(+61 2) 9283 3344

Countries should work together in resolving cross-border family disputes: Chief Justice

SINGAPORE – Family disputes with cross-border elements raise complex questions which countries have to resolve, said Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on Thursday (Sept 29).

He also announced that a pilot scheme to help divorcing parents and reduce conflict between them and their children will be introduced towards the end of this year.

Trained parenting coordinators will help those in high conflict to implement a parenting plan and guide them on resolving conflict.

From next week, parties with contested property disputes of over $3 million in value will attend private rather than court mediation as well, he said.

CJ Menon was speaking at the opening of the International Family Law Conference, which brings together speakers from the legal, psychological and social science sectors.

Highlighting that Singapore’s “significant rise in transnational marriages” has been accompanied by a corresponding rise in family disputes, CJ Menon stressed that the guiding principle in child-related proceedings is always the child’s welfare.

Divorce cases involving at least one party who is a foreigner rose from 31 per cent of cases filed in 2011 to 40 per cent last year.

A Family Justice Courts spokesman said that, on average, only 7 per cent of divorce cases involve both parties who are foreigners. More than 6,100 divorce writs have been filed yearly, on average, between 2011 and last year.

“The Child Abduction Convention resolves one aspect of cross-border disputes,” said CJ Menon, referring to the International Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

Signatory states are obliged to ensure a child’s prompt return to the jurisdiction where they usually reside when one parent has taken him or her away without consent of the other.

 

Read More: www.straitstimes.com

By: Seow Bei Yi

Back to News


Contact Us

John R Quinn & Co. Family Lawyers
Level 12, 60 Park Street
Sydney NSW 2000

The closest train stations are Town Hall, taking the Park Street exit, or St James Station, taking the Elizabeth Street exit. John R Quinn & Co. is on the corner of Park and Elizabeth.

Best parking is in the Domain parking station. Take the moving footway and cross Hyde Park to reach our offices.

Phone
(+61 2) 9283 3344
Email
[email protected]
Fax
9283 3366

In The Press

Mediation an ‘emerging profession’

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

How parenting coordination can assist law matter

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

Tax issues to consider in family law as the financial year closes

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

I don’t mind camping but I won’t sleep in my car

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers
More

John R Quinn News

The Importance of Estate Planning Before Capacity Becomes an Issue

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

Protecting Business Interests in Family Law Matters

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

The Family Business and Property Settlements: Why Valuations Matter

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers

Dying Intestate: Why Not Having a Will Can Harm Your Estate

October 13, 2016quinn lawyers
More

FAQ

Cost disclosure

What to expect from my first appointment with a lawyer from John R. Quinn and Co.

Why should I use John R. Quinn & Co?

Why use an accredited specialist lawyer when seeking a divorce?

More
John R Quinn & Co. Family Lawyers Logo black
Accredited Specialists in Family Law
© 2020. All rights reserved. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Website hosting by Lift Legal Marketing
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions |